The cancer paradigm is shifting and your oncologist may not even be aware yet. We know now that cancer is a metabolic disease. That is, cancer is caused by diseased mitochondria, the cellular organelles responsible for creating energy. Healthy mitochondria are able to create energy from a variety of sugar or fat fuels, using oxygen or not – but preferring oxygen. This adaptability is called metabolic flexibility. Cancerous cells, on the other hand, are only able to create energy using one method that uses sugar but no oxygen. This method is very inefficient and requires lots and lots of sugar. This fact, known as the Warburg Effect. This isn’t new knowledge – Otto Warburg won a Nobel Prize for the discovery in the 1931 and it’s the reason why PET scans work– it’s just something that cancer researchers stopped focusing on when DNA was discovered. Read more details on the science here.
After sequencing the genome of over 10,000 tumors and failing to find a meaningful pattern that could lead to a true cure for cancer, some doctors and researchers remembered Warburg’s discoveries and focused on treatments targeting cancer’s unique metabolism. And they are working!
So far, most of these treatments either can’t be patented or are too inexpensive for pharmaceutical companies to market them. In fact, the funding for studies proving effectiveness of these treatments comes primarily from non-profit foundations, cancer patients themselves, or a few public institutions who aren’t completely dependent on corporate benefactor and lobbyist dollars. But fortunately, the studies are being done.
In addition to reading the research being published, I’ve been privileged to attend conferences and liaise with the heads of in-progress studies. I’m confident that this new treatment paradigm will become standard in the next decade.
But most can’t afford to wait a decade.
What are Metabolic Therapies
Metabolic therapies treat the cause of cancer: the diseased mitochondria and the environmental factors that cause them to become diseased. Since the metabolic paradigm starting coming back into prominence around 2012 with Seyfried’s Cancer as a Metabolic Disease, research has been piling up supporting these treatments.
Even so, it will be some time before they’re part of the standard of care for cancer — or even part of medical education for oncologists. It’s therefore up to the patient to find a metabolically informed medical team or educate the doctors themselves.
Evidence-based metabolic therapies for cancer include:
- Fasting and calorie restriction
- Ketogenic diet
- Functional foods
- Reduction of overall cellular toxic load
- Stress reduction
- Off label drugs
- Supplements
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT)
This blog seeks to provide an overview of these therapies and the research behind them.
- Fasting and calorie restriction
- Ketogenic diet
- Functional foods
- Toxic load reduction
- Mindfulness-based stress reduction
- Breathwork
- Off label drugs
- Supplements
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT)
3 comments
Hi Maggie. I’ve written you before. I recently started on Keto. I have had 2 different types of Cancer, but in full remission. Is there any danger in staying at therapeutic level of ketosis while I get to my target weight (am obese and diabetic) or is there some drawback that you know of. I have been testing around 2.5 average GKI every day for past 4 days. I feel fine, but want to be sure I am not harming any organs by maintaining that low level of GKI. Any thoughts? I know you are not a doctor and do not hold yourself out as such so if you feel uncomfortable answering, I understand.
Hi Vicky! It’s great to hear from you again.
2.5 GKI is a great accomplishment and shows your discipline and dedication! Congrats!
Like you say, I can’t give medical advice but, in my experience, the risks associated with long-term keto are generally attributed to excessive animal protein consumption which can cause kidney damage. If you’re following the principles here and focusing on plant food with only small amounts of grass-fed, organic animal products, there should be very few risks.
Some women notice hormone disruption and I myself lost my period for 8 months following this way of eating. It was a small price to pay to become cancer free and achieve a healthy BMI but it’s a matter of individual priorities. I started eating legumes and fruit on the weekend before my weekly fast and my period returned and I could still maintain a therapeutic GKI most of the weeks.
I hope this is helpful! Sending love!
I appreciate your reply so much. I’ll try to cut down on animal protein. I’ve already gone through menopause so the second issue doesn’t affect me. You are proving a very important service and I am grateful for all of the time that you have put into this.
Returning that love right back to you!
Vicky